01 / The instrument
SonarFlow keeps observation, evaluation, context, and Review in one inspectable record. The interface is designed to preserve research state—not manufacture certainty.
Method model / Evidence boundary
| Stage | Boundary | State |
|---|---|---|
| Capture | Source record is accepted | Required |
| Freeze | Available inputs become immutable | Preserved |
| Evaluate | Missing authoritative proof blocks quality | Withheld |
| Separate | Later context remains outside scoring | Not scored |
Abstract method sequence. No market values or records are displayed.
02—04 / Operating principles
02
Raw options-flow observations stay distinct from the rules that evaluate them. The owner can inspect the transition instead of inheriting a black-box conclusion.
03
Every displayed fact keeps its source context, capture time, and availability state. If a required input is absent, SonarFlow names the gap instead of smoothing it over.
04
A committed Review stays attached to the original frozen evidence. Later marks remain context-only, so hindsight cannot move the scoring boundary after the fact.
05 / Evidence method
One official scoring implementation makes the same captured inputs produce the same research state. It does not predict price, guarantee execution, or remove market uncertainty.
Point-in-time terrain / EF—02
An evidence field keeps captured facts, derived context, and unresolved gaps in one record so the owner can reason from what was truly available.
Captured source evidence and its coverage limits are locked before evaluation begins.
Interactive evidence lab / EF—02
Change the research state. The record, rationale, and evidence boundary update together.
Open SonarFlowThe operating contract / 04
SonarFlow supports disciplined owner research. It does not promise outcomes, infer unavailable intent as fact, or execute trades.
Each case locks the evidence, source status, and origin that existed at capture. Later context is added separately and never replaces the original record.
Good data. No guessing.